| Blooming Prairie school board candidates discuss issues |
By: Melissa Kaelin
|
Posted: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:47 pm
|
Email Print
|
By MELISSA KAELIN
mkaelin@owatonna.com
BLOOMING PRAIRIE — Early on in the race, there appeared to be a little bit of competition among those running for the Blooming Prairie school board, but with just days before the vote, that is not the case.
After Chris Bodenstab removed his name from the running, Blooming Prairie was left with four candidates running for four seats on the school board, virtually assuring that the current slate of candidates will be elected once the tallies come in on Tuesday.
Still, the candidates took time to answer a number of questions surrounding their goals for Blooming Prairie public schools and their goals for the school board.
Student needs vs. taxpayer costs
Rodney Krell, who currently serves as the school board chair for Blooming Prairie and is up for reelection, said school board members should work to find a balance between student needs and spending.
“Basically the school board has X number of dollars of revenue, and we have to do the best we can with what we have,” said Krell. “It becomes a double-edged sword... You try to do the best for students but sometimes you can’t.”
Ronald Janning is also looking to return to the school board this year. Though he hasn’t served on the board for a number of years, he has held the position of school board chair in the past.
td>
| “I know we need to pay the correct amount of money for financing for the kids, but we also have to look at what we’re spending and how we’re spending it,” said Janning. He said though the school district has made a lot of cuts, there is more work that can be done to contain costs. “I know people don’t like to hear it, but we do have more extracurriculars than what we really need to be doing.”
Linda Kaplan would be new to the school board, but she said she hopes to serve the students of Blooming Prairie well during her first term.
“I think the current economy has caused all of us to look at our personal spending with a more critical eye. We have all been affected by the downturn and have fewer dollars to work with each month,” said Kaplan. “We’ve needed to distinguish and focus on needs, and to a far lesser degree on wants. The same logic will have to apply to decisions on spending for the schools.”
As for Jamie Bodenstab, who would also be new to the school board, she said the best way to look at that issue is from the standpoint of the community as a whole, taking into account both students and taxpayers.
Pay for Performance
Krell said a pay-for-performance system would be a difficult thing to implement for many reasons, including negotiations with the teachers’ union.
“I know other districts have tried it,” said Krell, “but I think you don’t have a consistent raw product.”
He said one class may be very advanced and have a very good teacher, while another class may need a considerable amount of help to perform at grade level, even though they still have a very good teacher.
Janning said while he thought it was important to make sure teachers are performing well, he would rather keep the pay system based on seniority.
“I would stay with the steps and lanes just as it is,” said Janning.
He said when there are questions about how well a teacher is performing, a paper trail should be kept on the teacher, and decisions should be made based on recorded instances.
Kaplan, on the other hand, indicated that a performance-based system may yield better student performance.
“I think there is definitely more incentive to be effective, creative and achieve goals if there are dollars at stake,” said Kaplan. “If you get the same amount of pay as everyone else that started on the same day that you started and it’s always going to be that way, there isn’t much point in doing anything above the average, unless you are internally motivated to always give 110 percent.”
Bodenstab said both systems have pros and cons, but she wanted a chance to learn more on the topic before taking a firm stance.
Year-round school
Primarily because of the challenges that the tourism industry would be faced with, Krell said he was not in favor of implementing year-round school.
Janning, on the other hand, said this issue might deserve another look.
“We’ve talked about that years ago, somewhat,” said Janning. “I don’t believe there would be anything wrong with it.”
He said by implementing a longer school year, students could progress faster in their lessons and could even cut down the years of education needed before entering college.
The other candidates, however, said they were undecided on the issue.
“I know there are discussions about extending the day and the length of time students are in school to help our U.S. students keep pace with students from other countries,” Kaplan said. “I can see some benefits for that. I think three months off in the summer is hard for some kids, especially the younger kids. If they are not reading or practicing math during the summer, it takes a while to get back in the swing of learning.”
And Bodenstab responded by saying such a change would need to account for everyone involved, from the community and parents to students and school staff.
The biggest challenge
After answering several questions on issues in education, each candidate took time to address what, in their minds, was the biggest challenge facing the Blooming Prairie School District. The candidates unanimously agreed that funding was the single largest problem facing the district, though each candidate suggested different strategies for dealing with it.
Krell pushed the operating referendum and said that the school needs the community’s help to overcome unallotments in state funding.
“The state has fallen behind in adequately funding education,” said Krell. “With the state giving us zero percent, it actually ends up being a negative number because of the unallotments by the governor. We need a 3 percent increase each year just to keep up with inflation.”
Janning, on the other hand, said it was not a good time to take a referendum to the voters, especially as workers throughout the state are taking cuts in pay and work hours.
“I do have somewhat of a problem having the referendum coming now,” said Janning.
He said he knows the district has to do something to balance its expenses, but he thought that more cost containment might be the key.
“You hate to do any cutting in extracurriculars, but you’re starting to see it come in more and more in a number of schools,” he said. “Education is really more important.”
Kaplan said because of the board’s responsibility to the students, the issue would challenge everyone to think outside of the box.
“Our biggest challenge, like many school districts in the state, is funding,” said Kaplan. “With so many schools seeking funding through referendums — the same old way of doing business has to change. We will have to look for creative solutions to these issues. If we stop offering services and cut learning opportunities such as band or choir to save money, we may save money in the short term — but if the students who want and need these services leave the district, we have even fewer dollars to work with. We’ll need to think outside the box as a group.”
For Bodenstab, the best way to move forward including contacting legislators and educating residents about the operating referendum, in order to get more people out to vote.
“Due to our lack of increase and proper funding from the state, we have had to look to our community for support,” said Bodenstab. “It is vital that we pass the upcoming levy to have continued success in our district.”
Melissa Kaelin can be reached at 444-2372.
|
|
|
|
Guidelines: Welcome to the Owatonna People's Press community. Please keep your comments civil. Don't attack other readers personally and keep your language decent. If you would like to report abuse click here to notify us.
|
|
Member Opinions:
By: getaclue on 10/30/09
I think its kind of funny how you get things passed in Blooming, Instead of telling people the truth, like for instance, We are deficit spending, but we want to renovate our school before we have funding to operate it efficiently, you say; We will be fine, lets build it and everybody will kick in. Now you say vote yes, its only $9 more a month, what happens when the town needs more money to keep things up, We already pay higher taxes than the surrounding towns. In my opinion all this can lead to, is less people wanting to live here. I think everybody should get together and ask for our property values to be adjusted for the current downtrend. Why are we paying for college level courses to be in our school when we are deficit spending? Why is this school so full of favoritism and nepotism? Why is it that we don't advance the children that need it, and don't do much to help the kids on the bottom? Why is it that the mayor doesn't show his face as being in charge of the yes committee? Why is it that we wrecked McFarlin field? Why is it that our hallways feel like bathrooms? Why is it we didn't incorporate our school colors into the theme of the school? Why is it that we pay almost $100,000 for a athletic director that doesn't teach a class? Why is it that our school board only represents what the superintendent tells them to and doesn't represent the community as a whole. Why doesn't the school board debate anything at their meetings, surely with this many problems there would be debates, isn't that why we have boards like these, maybe we should just get rid of the school board and let Olson decide everything, he does anyway. Why does it take until next months meetings to get answers, when you make choices that involves other people lives, you must be held accountable. Maybe all the solutions to these problems can be remedied with a different administration and school board. Maybe we should publish the wage reports, and let the voters see what they think of that. Now they take a wage freeze, right after getting raises, oh, isn't that convieniant. There raises were probably high enough for the next 3 years. Money isn't always the answer, sometimes it is the problem. Maybe we should stand next to the people handing out yes stickers and hand out wage reports at saturdays game. Is that our tax payers money paying for flyers and yes stickers? Let me get this straight for all you teachers that stick up for them in this board. People are more aware, so yes you are teaching us somthing, but maybe time would be better spent if you went to school and spent this much energy educating our children. Like alot of people in this community, I am not against giving the school money, I am against giving it to these bunch of clowns, knowing that they won't do the right things with it. When will we learn? Don't bother commenting, I am no longer logging onto this dribble!
By: whatthe on 10/30/09
If you believe any of this, I have some ocean-front property in Arizona that I'm selling. If you have questions about salaries, who is teaching what, freezes or raises, college courses, please call the high school and get real answers and not fiction posted on here. Enough said... It stopped raining! Have a good weekend everybody!
By: Cindy on 10/30/09
Obviously someone has a beef with Blooming Prairie schools. There are a couple of these in every town. If you look at the FACTS, BP teachers average salary was below the state average before they took a two year wage freeze. In fact, most teachers have received LESS in their paychecks for the last 4-5 years because of increased insurance costs that were passed on to the employees. Are they overpaid? No. Did they do the right thing by taking a wage freeze and helping out the district in tough economic times? Yes. The FACT is that the AD also is in charge of Buildings and Grounds for both schools. If you have a problem with the job he is doing, please follow him around for a week. Since he has taken the job you would see him at the school early, late, on weekends, and many other times when he is not required to by there by his contract. Just last week he took an entire Sunday afternoon to "edge" the sidewalks and gutters at the high school. You see, his AD job is about a half-time position, and the Building and Grounds position was full time. So really, he is doing the job of 1 and a half people. Not to mention that he is also Dean of Students and a Head Coach. It is interesting that "getaclue" in his/her rant cites, "Why are we paying for college level courses to be in our school when we are deficit spending?" and then two lines later writes, "Why is it that we don't advance the children that need it." It seems to me if we want to "advance the children that need it" a perfect way to do that is offer college level classes to high school students. I could go on, but I think "whatthe" has the right idea. Seek out information for yourself. Don't trust the uneducated, selfish rants of a disgruntled individual. Seek out the truth, because you really will not find it in "getaclue's" post.
By: BSBuster on 10/30/09
Getaclue, you should post the wage reports, many in BP would like to see these before they vote so they can come to their own conclusions. There must be a website that posts school averages so they can look and compare with other schools the same size. I have to agree with getaclue about having college courses in the school, can't they take post secondary options instead? I believe the school district must make education in BP affordable, especially with all the options becoming available to parents with the online schooling. By the way, I've heard nothing but GREAT comments about the online schooling. So if BP is going to continue with a good school system it must be made affordable. If they are having this hard of a time getting operating funds now, it will not become any easier in the future. I personally would not call the school for information, for they do not have a name for being upright and honest with the members of that community.
By: brightside on 10/30/09
Getaclue, you do need to get a clue! Your post is so fictional. We don't pay higher school taxes than surrounding communities. The mayor isn't in charge of the yes committee. The Yes stickers and flyers are not paid for by the school, they are paid for by the Yes Committee. "Why is it that our hallways feel like bathrooms?" What in the heck does that mean??? The school looks beautiful! McFarlin Field looked great last time I was there (Tuesday night). I could go on and on trying to clarify the mistruths, but it isn't worth my time. It is clear that getaclue doesn't have a clue.
By: brightside on 10/30/09
BSBuster, If studnets take post-secondary options, the school loses that funding. That funding is paid to the college. They offer college credits at the high school to keep students there and to help funding remain constant. If 10 students choose to go post-secondary that is $60,000 going out the door. Why wouldn't they offer students opportunities in their own school. I did check into teacher's salaries state wide. I found that Blooming Prairie teachers are right at the state average. I think Blooming Prairie has a lot to offer. We will always have to pay taxes to support our local schools. I would much rather support a school in my own town than have to send my children to an area school and then pay those taxes. I support the future of Blooming Praiire and the education that is provided. I will vote yes!
By: Cindy on 10/30/09
I love it when the "teacher bashing" starts. My question is always..If it's so EASY, and you get paid SO MUCH for it, then why didn't you do it? BSBuster, your question about having college courses in schools is a very valid one. The reason that high schools have implemented programs such as this is basically to try to serve the students better. They allow students to get college credits while still in the high school setting. Post-secondary is an option, but when the students go that route, their funding goes with them. As a result, when a large number of students go PSEO, that weakens the school. Look at it this way. If college courses are cut for next year, it may save somewhere in the neighborhood of $40,000. The problem is, there may be 15-20 students that wanted those college credits who now will be going Post-Secondary. The district will lose (at $6000 per student) about $90,000 to $120,000 in state funding. So, in effect, by saving $40,000 in cuts from the budget you have actually lost a lot of state funding. The end result is a negative 50-80K on the balance sheet. As far as being affordable, any parent of a student at either school who is thinking that $6-$9 per month is too much for these programs better think about the ramifications if it does not pass and what they will cost. For example: Pre-school fees could increase, Pre-school transportation could be cut, All-Day Every Day Kindergarten could be cut (resulting in increased day-care expense), activity fees could be increased, and college courses. If you put the value of college courses into monetary terms, a student who earns 16 college credits in high school is getting a semester of college paid for. Depending on the school, the value of that could range anywhere from $3000 to $12,000. That's a pretty nice "scholarship" that kids can get without even driving to Austin, Owatonna, or Rochester everyday. The most affordable option is to pass this referendum and keep the fees and programs which provide so much value (not just monetary) to all the students of Blooming Prairie.
By: athought on 10/30/09
getaclue~If everything is really that bad in Blooming Prairie, why do you still live there? If it is really that bad, why don't you try to find a town that does everything that you want--Good Luck!!
By: goodday on 10/30/09
Blooming Prairie is a wonderful community with a great school district. I too believe, that if you are so unhappy about where you live, move. But as for me, Blooming Praire is perfect! *A great place to raise a family. *A place where when you go to the football game, the whole town cheers on the team. *A place where people truly care about the success of all students and athletes. *A place where everybody knows your name. *A place where you walk down the street, people say hello and ask about your family. *A place that when there is a tragedy, the community pulls together to support one another. *A place where people are happy and kind to one another. *A place where teachers are involved in your child's life and care about their success. *A place where teachers forgo a raise and sacrifice so our children can have a better education. That is the kind of place I want to raise my children in...that place is Blooming Prairie!
By: Cindy on 10/30/09
Very well said goodday!!!
By: jimoconnor on 10/31/09
I would like to have everyone know where to get the proper information about wages. It is called a data practices request, any taxpayer funded government must comply. If you go to the school office they will give you the info. I also will give you a copy if you ask. Get factual information then vote accordingly.
|
|
| Login and voice your opinion!
|
|
|
|
|
Top Jobs | Top Homes | Top Cars
| Top Jobs | Master\'s level
Mental Health
Clinician Wanted
Part - ... | Healthcare
Chemical Health Counselor
Connections and
... | General
PUT YOUR
EXPERIENCE TO WORK
If you are 55 or... | General
Unity House
Various Part Time
Positions to W... | Trades/Construction
Ellingson Companies
is now hiring ... |
| Top Homes | Available 2 BD
Upper, $650/Mo. Owatonna
507-213-9862... |
WELCOME TO YOUR NEW HOME
WOODBRIDGE
APARTMENTS
1... | 1 & 2 BD APTS
IN OWATONNA
& MEDFORD
24 hr approval!
Im... | ONE BEDROOM
FREE HEAT in Owatonna
507-318-0139... | 1 BD w/garage, hardwood fls, ground level, laundry on site ... |
| Top Cars | 1995 BONNEVILLE SSEI Red, super charged & pretty 1 small rus... | 1997 Ford F350
1 ton dually , white recent brake, tires a... |
|